‘It’s heartbreaking’: the way thirty confined beluga whales are being used as tools in conflict over animal cruelty.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.
A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.
But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who work with them regularly.
After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to end their lives unless the authorities funds the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and communal behavior suggest they are remarkably smart mammals – something a former trainer learned personally.
Burgess spent three years as a beluga trainer, a position that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and unique traits in their personalities. She formed a particular love for a pair of whales with different temperaments.
“One whale chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “They changed the way I understand relationships.”
Public Concerns and Facility Decline
Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a context of growing public opposition to their captivity.
During her three years at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to age-related causes, but which campaigners say points to the poor conditions in which they were housed.
The facility did not open to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and constant attention than any human in the Britain, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the demise of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any plans to put down even a single beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She backs requests for the whales to be transferred right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.
In recent months, the nation’s government official rejected a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued situation in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would continue the treatment these belugas have endured.”
But Burgess said the official’s comments reveal a more general misunderstanding of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate
As officials work to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.
A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The prospective site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.
Others say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the near future.
The project lead, director of the initiative, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|